Go Home Creator Bio Open Investigations Legal Proceedings Resolved Cases

Public-Source Archive

All materials displayed on this site are aggregated from publicly available records.

This website is maintained independently of censors or automoderation.

Ramsey County, Minnesota

Abuse of Process and ADA Retaliation

Full Archive Here

  • Strickland v. Ramsey County, et al.

    • Type: Federal civil rights action (ADA, §1983, Rehab Act)
    • Core Issues: ADA retaliation; due process violations; altered court records (unsigned/re-dated orders); unassigned judges issuing rulings; lost/misdirected filing fees; eFiling/payment portal irregularities; off-docket coordination between county officials and private counsel.
    • Defendants/Actors: Ramsey County and court personnel; multiple referees/judicial officers; Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. (outside counsel).
    • Timeframe: May 12, 2025 – present (active)
    • Status: Ongoing in U.S. District Court (District of Minnesota)

Madeline Sally Lee

Harassment, Stalking, Defamation

Full Archive Here

  • Strickland v. Lee (Appellate)

    • Type: Appellate action
    • Core Issues: Vacatur of an unlawfully obtained and void HRO.
    • Defendants/Actors: Madeline Sally Lee initiated a pattern of online harassment campaigns and retaliatory use of police and the courts. Includes false accusations made under perjury, coordinated harassment across digital platforms, and misuse of judicial process as a tool of harm.
    • Timeframe: August 19, 2024 – present (active)
    • Status: Ongoing in Minnesota Appellate Courts
    • Victim Impact Statement

  • Strickland v. Lee (Civil)

    • Type: Civil action
    • Core Issues: Harassment; defamation by libel; cyberstalking; abuse of process; intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED); civil conspiracy.
    • Defendants/Actors: Madeline Sally Lee
    • Timeframe: March 6, 2025 – ongoing (active)
    • Status: Case initiated in conciliation court; subsequently removed to district court following irregular lower court proceedings. Multiple procedural challenges under review.

Strickland v. Meta Platforms

Corporate Accountability for Monetized Harassment

Fun Archive Here

  • Strickland v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

    • Type: Federal civil action (pending filing)
    • Core Issues: Unjust enrichment; monetization of harassment; failure to prevent defamation and abuse targeting a disabled individual.
    • Defendants/Actors: Meta’s platforms were used to disseminate harassment and defamatory content tied to ongoing litigation in Minnesota. Despite notice, Meta continued to profit through engagement and advertising revenue generated from abusive material.
    • Status: Complaint pending filing in U.S. District Court. Claims will seek recovery under theories of unjust enrichment and related equitable relief.