The Problematic History of Madeline S. M. Lee

Scope and Methodology

This page is a documentary archive. It preserves public statements, court filings, platform actions, and preserved communications associated with Madeline Sally Machla Lee.

It does not speculate beyond the documentary record, assign criminal guilt, or purport to adjudicate disputed facts. Where testimony or third-party statements are included, they are identified as such.

Assertions on this page are supported by timestamps, metadata, screenshots, filings, or sworn statements preserved elsewhere in this archive.

Who Is Madeline Lee?

Madeline Sally "Machla" Lee (formerly Fleigle) is a self-described "sexual educator" and online personality who has, over a period of years, repeatedly involved herself in adversarial conflicts with other women through social-media campaigns, legal filings across multiple jurisdictions, and extensive narrative reconstruction.

Publicly and in filings, Lee has presented herself as a victim requiring protection while simultaneously initiating or amplifying actions that resulted in law enforcement contact, domestic abuse court proceedings, civil litigation, and platform enforcement against her targets.

The record shows a consistent pattern: allegations are made, urgency is asserted, third parties are mobilized, and contradictions surface once documentation is preserved. When challenged, the narrative shifts. When questioned, the record fragments. What remains is not a single incident, but a recurring structure.

This archive exists because that structure left a trail - screenshots, filings, timestamps, metadata, and sworn statements - that does not collapse under review. The story only works if no one keeps receipts. Unfortunately for Lee, someone did.

Protection, as framed in Lee's accounts, is consistently monetized. Public narratives of danger or hardship are accompanied by solicitation of funds, even as she simultaneously presents herself as stable or successful.

Grifting, Stalking, and Child Safety Concerns

Madeline Lee maintains an extensive public footprint across social media platforms, operating under an umbrella of aliases. Over a period of years, she has cultivated a highly sexualized online persona framed around a self-described form of "Marxism," frequently emphasizing nudity and erotic performance as political, educational, or artistic expression.

This public-facing identity blends explicit sexual content, informal digital "education," and ideological branding into a carefully curated presentation. The persona is repeatedly positioned as socially conscious, feminist, and justice-oriented, while simultaneously functioning as a mechanism for attention, credibility, and audience mobilization.

Separate from her online presentation, Lee became the subject of multiple child-safety related referrals and investigations by county authorities. Records reflect at least two independently initiated contacts involving Children's Services in Hennepin County and Ramsey County during June and July of 2024, along with numerous preserved complaints raising concerns about her conduct.

This archive does not speculate on outcomes beyond the documentary record. It preserves the existence, timing, and volume of these interventions because they materially contradict Lee's public narratives of persecution while establishing a consistent pattern of third-party concern.

What Is Madeline's Background?

Before adopting the name Pojo Kutty HaZonah, Madeline Sally Machla Lee operated publicly under the alias Leelee Cocodrie. It was under that name that she first made contact with me while I was a monetized content creator on platforms operated by Meta. That interaction marked the beginning of her attempts to attach herself to my online visibility and audience.

As engagement increased, Lee began circulating my name across multiple platforms, including YouTube, WhatsApp, Bluesky, Facebook, and Telegram. During this period, her online framing shifted away from erotic self-branding and toward a narrative of personal victimhood that generated higher visibility and interaction.

In her own statements and posts, Lee and associated accounts encouraged the normalization of explicit sexual display as a social good. These claims were frequently justified using rhetoric about empowerment, liberation, and safety.

Concerns arose when such rhetoric intersected with discussions of children and youth, framed as efforts to make others "comfortable with sexuality" or to prevent abuse. These statements and materials are preserved here as part of the public record, without speculation beyond what was posted and circulated.

Documented Risk and Public-Safety Concerns

Madeline Sally Machla Lee has previously worked within Minnesota school systems and has publicly posted images and descriptions of classroom environments and the children she worked with. Due to the nature of that material, most such images are not reproduced here.

At the same time, Lee has maintained an extensive public history of advocating for openness around sexuality and sexual expression. When her conduct is questioned or criticized, the response pattern documented in the record involves rapid escalation to allegations of abuse or harassment directed at third parties, including law enforcement, courts, social-media platforms, and service providers.

The issue presented here is not disagreement with ideology, but the repeated collision between sexualized content, children's spaces, and retaliatory allegations triggered by scrutiny. These conditions are incompatible with environments that require clear boundaries and safeguarding.

By her own statements and preserved records, Lee has been reported to child-protection authorities on at least three separate, documented occasions. This archive preserves the existence and timing of those reports without asserting outcomes beyond the record.

In court, Lee characterized alleged screenshots of text messages as "private sexual images" and alleged that their existence constituted harassment, notwithstanding that similar or more explicit material was simultaneously being distributed publicly under her own accounts.

While Lee has argued that distribution of sexual imagery constitutes abuse, preserved records show her operating multiple public channels - including Telegram - where explicit sexual content involving herself and others is routinely shared.

How Is Social Media Involved?

A significant portion of the harassment documented in this archive originates from coordinated activity on Facebook and related platforms. Public profiles associated with Pojo Kutty HaZonah including "Pojo Kutty HaZonah/Sakhav Pojo HaZonah," "Slam/Slammy Cunningham," and "Kim Gordon/Karlie Haler" engaged in sustained, high-frequency posting behavior directed at strangers for the purpose of provoking engagement.

Preserved records show the use of multiple alternate accounts to evade enforcement and to mass-report targets. These profiles function as a loose network rather than as isolated actors.

Targets are routinely mocked using personal characteristics, including disability, gender expression, age, physical appearance, and neurodivergence.

Autism-related ridicule appears frequently where users believe a reaction can be elicited.

Across platforms, engagement is driven by repeated accusations - including claims of racism, sexual misconduct, drug use, stalking, and violence.

With demands that targets prove innocence. When evidence is provided, mass-reporting typically follows.

The behavior documented here extends beyond isolated posts. Participants track targets across platforms, including Facebook groups, image boards, Discord servers, and private messaging channels, creating continuity of harassment rather than discrete incidents.

In several instances, online activity escalated into real-world consequences. Once a target's associates, offline identity or family members are identified, those individuals become secondary targets.

Documented tactics include police reports, civil filings, registrar abuse complaints, phone calls, letters, immigration-related reports, and restraining-order petitions supported by altered or misleading screenshots. These tools are repeatedly deployed following online disputes.

Responding to their lawsuits and false allegations is rewarded with accusations of being litigious or unhinged.

As of July 15, 2025, my personal and public Facebook accounts were permanently disabled following coordinated reporting campaigns.

But Who Is Onion Madder?

I have operated under the name Onion Madder online since 2003. Long before the term "content creator" entered common use, I was publishing, experimenting, and building audiences across early internet platforms using a mix of art, technical work, humor, and interactive media.

Over the years, my work has included pinup modeling, competitive speedrunning (including verified world records), educational video production, interactive fiction, and the release of dozens of independent games under my own imprint.

I built and maintained a fully immersive alternate-reality project spanning hundreds of pages and dozens of interconnected domains, and I was contracted as a content creator for Meta-owned platforms over a three-year period.

In parallel, I have operated multiple small businesses and creative ventures under my own name and brand, including Nodehole and Mess o Pedals, while living with permanent disability since my early twenties.

This context matters because it establishes baseline reality. I did not seek notoriety, protection, or amplification through conflict. I already had a body of work, an audience, and a documented professional history long before the events preserved in this archive.

I was already here.

Why Did Pojo Focus on Onion?

Prior to adopting the Pojo Kutty persona, Madeline Sally Machla Lee operated publicly under the name Leelee Cocodrie in left-leaning online communities. That identity became the subject of sustained public ridicule and internal conflict following allegations circulated within those spaces concerning misuse of funds and personal misconduct.

Public discussion of those allegations intensified in 2022–2023, after which Lee began transitioning her online identity toward the Indian-coded "Pojo Kutty" persona. The timing of that shift closely followed the collapse of her prior standing within the same communities that had initially amplified her.

Around this period, Lee began following my accounts while still using the Leelee Cocodrie name. Shortly thereafter, she initiated contact with members of my social circle, including my husband and his acquaintances, without prior relationship or context.

The record reflects a consistent pattern: when an existing identity becomes untenable, a new persona is constructed, accompanied by the acquisition of a fresh audience and the re-targeting of individuals with established visibility.

A Tangled Web

Over time, information surfaced publicly indicating that Lee was simultaneously maintaining multiple romantic engagements, primarily with men located in India, without disclosure between parties. These revelations emerged independently of my involvement and circulated widely online.

During this period, Lee was the subject of ongoing public criticism. At the time, I chose to defend her against what appeared to be disproportionate ridicule, believing she was experiencing personal instability and compounding scrutiny.

My intent was de-escalation. I viewed the situation as another instance of online cruelty directed at a woman already under pressure and did not wish to contribute to that dynamic.

Shortly thereafter, additional claims emerged from individuals previously connected to Lee, raising concerns about sexual health, disclosure, and conflicting narratives surrounding consent and risk.

These accounts did not resolve the situation. Instead, they added further complexity to an already unstable network of relationships, accusations, and identity reconstruction.

The Cruelty Documented in the Record

During later conversations, an individual previously accused by Madeline Sally Machla Lee of sexual abuse provided a detailed account of the events underlying that allegation. This archive preserves his statements as testimony, not as findings of fact.

According to his account, the two had an established sexual relationship and were involved in what he believed to be an exclusive, long-term partnership. On the night in question, consensual sexual activity occurred, followed by a request that he later understood to be unwelcome.

He stated that, at the time the allegation was made public, he believed it would be inappropriate to challenge a woman's claim of sexual abuse. He described internal conflict shaped by ideological commitments and prevailing norms within leftist spaces, particularly the emphasis on believing accusers without requiring evidentiary dispute.

What followed, according to his statements, was not separation or closure. Instead, Lee continued to maintain contact with him over an extended period, repeatedly framing him as uniquely culpable and herself as the sole person capable of understanding his actions. He described this dynamic as isolating and psychologically destabilizing.

This archive does not adjudicate the truth of competing narratives about consent. It documents a different, observable harm: the prolonged use of an unresolved accusation to sustain control, dependency, and silence.

When I later withdrew public support for Lee, the pattern of retaliation documented elsewhere in this archive began.

Manipulation, Triangulation, and Narrative Control

The escalation began with unsolicited messages from former friends and acquaintances expressing concern about my mental health. While some framed their outreach as care, others repeated allegations attributed to Madeline Sally Machla Lee, including claims that I was violent, threatening, or unstable.

At the same time these claims circulated privately and publicly, Lee submitted statements to the court asserting that she was not involved in coordinating outside contact. The preserved record reflects a material discrepancy between those assertions and the contemporaneous messaging activity.

When I attempted to address the situation directly and set boundaries, that outreach was reframed as harassment. Communications intended to stop third-party contact were selectively presented to courts as evidence of wrongdoing.

After repeated unsolicited contact from Lee's friends, partners, and associates, I issued a cease-and-desist letter requesting that my personal contact information no longer be shared and that third-party contact stop.

That same letter was then presented to multiple audiences in conflicting ways: as evidence of harassment in legal filings, and as justification for ridicule and escalation within online communities.

Across these interactions, a consistent pattern emerges: provocation, selective documentation, removal of context, and subsequent presentation of that material as proof of abuse. Attempts to disengage or defend boundaries are incorporated into the same narrative rather than resolving it.

The record does not show mutual conflict. It shows a feedback loop in which accusation produces reaction, reaction is reframed as evidence, and evidence is used to justify further escalation.

A History of Escalation and Harm

Over time, Madeline Sally Machla Lee has repeatedly mobilized public "callout" campaigns on social media, particularly within left-leaning Facebook spaces, directing attention and hostility toward individuals who criticize or disengage from her.

During the period in which I was being publicly targeted, multiple individuals contacted me independently to describe prior experiences in which Lee had similarly focused attention on them, resulting in sustained harassment and eventual withdrawal from online spaces.

Across these incidents, a consistent dual structure appears: outward-facing recruitment and victim framing paired with private denial of coordination or responsibility. These parallel narratives do not remain internally consistent.

When confronted with contradictions, responsibility is routinely displaced onto third parties-friends, romantic partners, followers, or strangers-rather than addressed directly.

Rather than resolving over time, the behavior escalated. Approximately six months after the initial campaign began, Lee shared my personal phone number with an individual named Sumit Sinha, whom she had recently met through an online dating platform. He then contacted me directly.

Following this exchange, Sinha located a public post I had made describing the incident and responded by publishing my husband's full legal name alongside personal assertions about his relationship with Lee.

In Lee's subsequent response to my civil lawsuit, she stated that Sinha had contacted me respectfully and independently. She further asserted that she had not provided him with my contact information.

These representations conflict with the preserved sequence of events. The same pattern appears throughout the record: third-party involvement occurs, responsibility is disclaimed, and contradictory explanations are offered depending on audience.

By March 6, 2025, after months of sustained contact, escalation, and narrative contradiction, I filed a civil action seeking relief and an end to the conduct.

Two audiences. Two versions. One record.

Former Friends and Social Amplification

The same events are thus described one way in sworn filings and another way in public discourse, depending on audience.

By August 2024, the volume and visibility of the accusations circulating about me reached a point where silence was no longer viable. I addressed the claims publicly in an attempt to correct the record.

Following that response, several individuals I had previously considered friends began recirculating Lee's allegations. Rather than de-escalating, their involvement intensified as I attempted to defend myself, amplifying the reach and severity of the claims.

At no point did these individuals have firsthand knowledge of the events they were asserting. Their participation functioned as secondary amplification, converting private accusations into a broader social campaign.

Weaponizing Disability

Madeline Sally Machla Lee was aware that I am autistic and live with complex post-traumatic stress disorder. That information was not private within our interactions.

After third parties began making public accusations about me, I sent Lee a cease-and-desist letter requesting that the contact and dissemination of claims stop. The letter was an attempt to establish boundaries and reduce harm.

Rather than treating the letter as a boundary, Lee submitted it as "evidence" of harassment in a civil action filed in New Delhi, India, characterizing me as a subordinate participant in her own allegations.

As the situation escalated, my neurodivergence was reframed within her narrative as a tactic I was allegedly using against her. This framing appeared alongside public claims that she would never exploit disability.

At the same time, preserved records show strangers publicly mocking my autism in spaces where Lee's accusations were being circulated, creating a direct conflict between sworn denials and observable outcomes.

The contradiction is not ideological. It is documentary: disability is disavowed as a weapon in formal settings while its effects are realized in public spaces.

The Campaign Expands

By May 2025, the same sexual assault allegation first circulated by Ewan Leask in August 2024 was being repeated widely by Lee's friends, followers, and associates. The claim appeared across multiple platforms without new evidence or firsthand accounts.

During this period, my likeness was incorporated into memes, and thousands of comments from strangers labeled me a rapist, a Nazi, racist, transphobic, and violent. These characterizations were repeated by individuals with no prior relationship to me.

I also received direct messages from individuals local to me asserting that they would "hex" me or warn others to exclude me from organizing spaces. These communications mirrored the same narrative framing circulating publicly.

As the campaign intensified, I lost professional contracts, social media accounts, followers, and longstanding personal relationships. I was forced to abandon existing work and begin rebuilding my livelihood while responding to sustained third-party contact generated by the allegations.

Personal photographs were repurposed as memes by third parties, further extending the reach of the campaign. These actions occurred concurrently with sworn statements asserting fear and lack of coordination.

During this phase, my post-traumatic stress disorder was referenced repeatedly in public discourse, with reactions to the harassment later cited as evidence of instability. The feedback loop became self-reinforcing.

Public claims of fear coincided with private encouragement of continued engagement. Nearly every allegation attributed to me appeared simultaneously in the conduct directed toward me by others.

My inbox continued to fill with unsolicited messages from individuals repeating the same claims. Many stated explicitly that they had learned of me through Lee or her associates.

Mass-reporting campaigns were then initiated against my remaining social media accounts, with participants openly celebrating their removal.

After I withdrew from most social media platforms, the same tactics shifted toward registrar abuse complaints and DMCA takedown requests directed at my legal archive.

The expansion was not limited to a single platform or moment. It followed a repeatable structure: allegation, amplification, enforcement, and displacement. By the time formal responses were possible in court, the reputational and economic harm had already occurred.

The record does not show fear. It shows propagation.

Escalation to the Courts

Following months of online escalation, the dispute entered the court system. Despite publicly presenting herself as financially unstable, Madeline Sally Machla Lee retained representation from a municipal defense firm with an established record representing landlord and government interests.

The transition from online allegation to formal legal process marked a shift in tactics. Claims previously circulated through social media were introduced into judicial proceedings, where procedural mechanisms replaced public persuasion.

The matter was assigned to Referee Elizabeth Clysdale. Publicly available litigation records reflect prior allegations that Referee Clysdale has incorporated social media activity into judicial decision-making.

In previous federal litigation, it was alleged that Referee Clysdale relied on online narratives and external characterizations when issuing rulings, resulting in claims of retaliatory or irregular judicial conduct.

The procedural posture of this case mirrors that pattern: allegations first circulated online, then reintroduced through court filings, where they were treated as presumptively credible without independent evidentiary testing.