Madeline Sally Lee: Cyberstalker

My name is Onion Madder

This page serves as a permanent digital archive to document the mass stalking and harassment campaign instigated by "Sakhavu Pojo Kutty", aka Madeline Sally Lee.

Social media addiction caused Madeline to spend years obsessively tracking my activity, and encouraging others to do the same.

Using the Facebook mobile app to mimick the behavior of kiwifarms and 4chan, unemployed "leftbook" users like "Pojo Kutty HaZonah", "Slam Cunningham", and "Karlie Haler", spend fourteen to eighteen hours a day on their phones harassing strangers for engagement.

Many of them have dozens of alternate profiles, used for mass reporting their victims and ban evasion.

They and their followers use personal images to make memes ridiculing autism, gender, teeth, age, and attractiveness.

These "bullies" get deeply involved with their victims: tracking them across the internet via Facebook groups, image boards, discord chats, etc.

Their behavior often carries over into real life. If they are able to connect anyone to you, those people become targets as well.

Police reports, lawsuits, letters, phone calls, registrar abuse, USCIS (greencard) reports, even restraining orders obtained using digitally altered screenshots. All have been weaponized by these 4channers masquerading as Marxists.

Arguing with them is futile, all attempts at logic are immediately ridiculed, mocked, and disclaimed as "anti Marxist" or "Trumpian".

Mentally similar to children, leftbookers become enraged if the target doesn't cave to their demands.

Even lighthearted mocking results in extreme vindictive behaviors.

I registered the domain pojokutty.com and used it to create a dossier for a fictional cryptid, backlinked to my immersive ARG.

Despite the site not naming her, using her image, or referring to Madeline in any way, she submitted a report flagging my domains as abusive and threatening.

The singular goal is engagement; farmed via near-constant accusations of rape, racism, drug addiction, stalking, and more.

The stalkers demand that their targets provide proof of innocence and if the target complies, they mass report for hate speech, drug use, and inciting violence.

As of July 15, 2025, my personal and public Facebook accounts have been permanently disabled via coordinated reporting campaigns.

I have chosen to no longer fend off unemployed leftbookers, therefore many of the screenshots that tell the complete story are unavailable to me.

As such, this should be considered an evolving archive.

Who is Onion Madder?

I have been a creative entity on the internet since 2003. Before the concept of content creator existed, I utilized multiple forms of internet media to gather a modest but loyal following.

I have done pinup modeling, won world records for speed running, created niche educational content in video form, and released dozens of indie games under my own brand

I hand built a fully immersive ARG spanning hundreds of pages and dozens of domains, contracted as a content creator for Meta over the course of three years, and run multiple successful businesses despite being permanently and totally disabled from the age of 22.

But who is Pojo Kutty?

Although she goes by Pojo Kutty HaZonah now, it was the name Leelee Cocodrie that Madeline Sally Lee was using when she found me as a monetized content creator for Meta, and decided that I was her ticket to social media fame.

WARNING: Graphic Content

When pretending to be a victim got her more clicks than being a "sexy Marxist mommy", she began circulating my name across YouTube, WhatsApp, Bluesky, Facebook, and Telegram to increase her engagement.

Madeline has a long history of proudly presenting herself as a highly sexualized Marxist "educator".

Under the guise of sex-forward, nudity empowered Marxism, Madeline and her associates have long encouraged the open display of sexuality and lewdness.

Particulary around children, allegedly as a means to make them "comfortable with sexuality" and to keep them safe from "potential abusers".

WARNING: Graphic Content

Is she dangerous?

Madeline Sally Lee has a background of working within Minnesota school systems, and a history of posting photos of the classrooms she works in, as well as descriptions of the children she spends time with. It is inappropriate to repost most of those images here.

Despite her extensively documented public history supporting openness about sexuality, any criticism of her behavior triggers immediate accusations of abuse to police, courts, social media, and now domain registrars.

Her behavior cannot survive open criticism. There is no situation in which this sexualization of children's spaces can be tolerated, and she knows this.

By her own admission, she has been reported to children's protective services for her behavior on at least three separately documented occasions.

WARNING: Graphic Content

Her allegations to the court include that I shared "private sexual images" of her, with the clarification that the "private sexual images" were actually screenshots of her text messages, and alleged to have been seen by her friends.

While Madeline claims that distribution of sexual images is a form of harassment, she uses multiple social media outlets including Telegram to publicly share sexual content of herself and other people.

Why Did She Choose Me?

Leelee Cocodrie was known in leftist internet spaces for allegedly volunteering for and then embezzling funds from a Marxist organization, and using those funds to purchase masturbatory aids (dildos) from her place of employment.

Madeline Lee began following me sometime in 2022 or 2023 while using the name Leelee Cocodrie. Shortly after following me, she began switching her identity over to the Indian-centric "pojo kutty" persona.

Shortly after her former comrades targeted her with hundreds of memes mocking her, "Leelee Cocodrie" became "Pojo Kutty".

After finding me via a popular public post, she began systematically adding my friends and followers, specifically my Indian husband and his acquaintances.

A Tangled Web

After nearly two years of being aware of Madeline, it came out publicly that she was simultaneously engaged to six different Indian men, none of whom was aware of the others.

During this period of time, Madeline was being ridiculed on the internet by her many critics. I did defend her behavior and try to defuse the situation.

I believed she was enduring difficult times as a single mother and was already under heavy criticism. Despite having some criticism of my own, I didn't want to leave another mother dangling for the social media sharks.

Shortly after my post defending Madeline, a different young Indian man that Madeline had previously accused of rape came forward, claiming that they had been having unprotected sex.

He said he was concerned with her serial engagements and sexual promiscuity, and what it meant in terms of potential STI exposure.

The Cruelty of Madeline Lee

During our discussions of the events that lead up to Madeline's sexual abuse allegation, he confessed to me that the "rape" was Madeline using her hand to physically stimulate his penis to orgasm.

The context of this alleged assault was that they had a pre-existing sexual relationship predicated on being in an exclusive long term relationship. The night in question, Madeline had come to his house and kissed him, then he performed oral sex on her.

After, he asked her to touch his penis and she declined. He insisted and she reluctantly used her hand to finish him to climax.

He confessed to me in our conversations that he felt at the time of her accusations that it would be wrong to argue with a woman accusing him of sexual abuse, due to his inherent beliefs as a Marxist and the results of the "Me Too" movement in leftist spaces, which rightfully established that victims shouldn't be forced to provide direct evidence of their trauma to be believed.

He also told me that his feelings about the situation had evolved because of the two years that Madeline continued to speak and meet with him, isolating him by repeating to him that she was the only Marxist that would understand "what he did".

After I publicly retracted my previous support of Madeline, the harassment began.

Manipulation, Triangulation, and Lies

It started with messages from former friends about my mental health, some feigning concern, but most repeating Madeline's accusations of being violent and abusive.

The truth vs her lies.

When I tried to speak to her personally, she spun the story to make herself a victim. My attempt to set a boundary became proof to the court I was “harassing” her.

After being repeatedly contacted by her friends and lovers, I sent Madeline a cease & desist letter demanding that she stop sharing my personal phone number and having people contact me.

She presents the cease & desist letter to multiple courts as evidence of harassment, and to her friends as reasoning for further ridicule.

Madeline's pattern is to provoke, screenshot, and twist the truth until it fits her need at the time. Any attempt at self defense becomes another accusation of abuse against her.

Her MO is always the same: false accusation, provoke a response, remove the context, then screenshot the results as proof that people deserve it.

She keeps two stories running: public recruitment and private denial. But her stories don't add up.

Not surprisingly, plausible deniability is Madeline's only defense. She has pointed fingers at everyone but herself: blaming her friends, lovers, followers, strangers. Anyone but the one person actually to blame.

But her abuse never stops, it escalates with time. Six months after her campaign began, she gave my phone number to a man named Sumit Sinha that she recently met on a dating site. He contacted me by text message, and I informed him that he was participating in stalking and harassment.

Sumit then went to Facebook and found the public post I had made about the incident and posted my husband's full legal name along with a bizarre story about being Madeline's "person" and claiming he had met her on a dating site.

In Madeline's rebuttal to my lawsuit, she stated that Sumit Sinha has contacted me "respectfully" and of his own accord.

By March 6, 2025, I had finally had enough. I filed a civil suit against Madeline for the ongoing harassment and trauma, desperate to make her feel any sort of ramifications for her actions and leave me alone.

Two audiences, two versions. Public recruitment vs. sworn denial.

Former Friends

By August of 2024, her social media campaign had gotten enough attention to force me to respond to her accusations publicly.

Some of the people I previously considered friends began recirculating her accusations, escalating in response to my attempts at self-defense.

Weaponizing Disability

Madeline was aware that I'm autistic and have CPTSD. After her friends made false public accusations, I sent her a cease-and-desist letter in an attempt to persuade her to stop.

Instead of recognizing the letter as a boundary, she submitted it as “evidence” of harassment in a lawsuit she filed in New Delhi, India labeling me a “lackey” in her alleged harassment.

When I stood up for myself she twisted the story further: reframing my autism as a weapon I was supposedly using against her.

She circulated her lies until strangers were mocking me online for being autistic, while simultaneously swearing to the court that she "would never weaponize disabilities".

The Campaign Expands

By May of 2025, her friends and followers were repeating the same lie Ewan Leask started in August of 2024.

From her friends came memes with my face, thousands of strangers calling me a rapist, a Nazi, racist, transphobic, violent.

I even received messages from someone local to me, claiming they would "hex me" and spread awareness to keep me away from "organizing spaces".

I lost my contracts, my social media accounts, my followers, my friends. I had to start a new career from scratch while spending most of my energy fending off people she had wound up and set loose on me, many of them my former friends and support system.

Even my personal photos became memes for her friends to laugh at. Her campaign was never about truth. It was about entertainment, about dogpiling, and about destroying me in public for fun.

This wasn’t about being “frightened.” It was about building a narrative. She weaponized my PTSD, told others to use it against me, and then pointed to the backlash she manufactured as proof that I was the danger. A self-feeding cycle.

Madeline didn’t just file quietly in court, she staged a public circus. She told anyone who would listen that I was harassing her, while organizing mobs to come after me. Nearly every accusation she made was something she was doing herself.

Meanwhile, my inbox filled with messages from strangers she had primed with lies. They didn’t know me, and they didn’t care. They simply echoed her story and layered on their own cruelty.

Madeline and her associates repeatedly coordinated mass-reporting campaigns against my social media pages, openly gloating about silencing me.

These efforts continue even now. Although I left Facebook and stopped using nearly all social media, Madeline Lee has persisted in her harassment, targeting me instead through coordinated registrar abuse complaints and abusive DMCA takedowns.

This wasn’t random. It was coordinated. She fed half-truths and screenshots into her network, and out came strangers across the internet telling me I should die. By the time I had the chance to file responses in court, the damage to my safety, livelihood, and reputation was already done.

Despite her public posture of poverty and self-styled Marxism, Madeline was able to retain a pro-landlord municipal defense firm to represent her in court. The underlying dispute was never about resources or principle—it was about weaponizing process.

Abandoning the ethos of Marxism allowed her to use the police to further her personal agenda. Instead of being targets of her hatred, the courts became props for her abuse; while allowing her to continue to grift her community for "mutual aid" as an unemployed single mother.

This case exists because Madeline needed a villain for social media, and Referee Elizabeth Clysdale needed someone to punish. Clysdale has a documented history of using social media as a pipeline to identify and punish targets through the court system.

Prior litigation against Clysdale alleges that she weaponizes her judicial role by importing social media feuds into the courtroom and using her authority to silence and punish. Madeline’s case against me is part of that continuum: false narratives amplified online, then legitimized through irregular and retaliatory court action.